Over the last several years, I have noticed both a growing impatience with teachers as well as an oversimplification of how to do incredibly complex things, such as build relationships or engage and empower learners. Often times teachers receive feedback in the form of directives to differentiate, establish better routines, or to include student voice and choice, with little modeling or support for teachers. It can be easy to fall into the nostalgia black hole of how much better things used to be, so while trying to avoid that path, I've been thinking about what changes might account for impatience and oversimplification. As a result, I've been reflecting a lot lately about my most influential mentors when I was a young teacher as well as what role mentorship plays in my work as a coach. Ultimately, I believe some of the shifts I've noticed for teachers is because some of the forms of mentorship that shaped me as an educator are missing for teachers right now.
When I was first hired as a middle school ELA teacher I had to meet with the Superintendent to sign my contract to officially accept my position. In addition to the not so minor detail that the superintendent sat in a chair beside me rather than across from me at his desk, another moment from this meeting has been cemented in my memory. I'm sure he had dozens of other meetings and responsibilities that day, but he patiently talked with me about teaching. He talked to me about getting students’ attention and how that can often be done more effectively by quieting down myself rather than raising my voice in desperation and gave me other sound advice for a new teacher that were drawn from lessons of his own experiences as a new teacher. At the time I definitely listened to and accepted his advice, but it wasn't until years later that I really appreciated this experience. The fact that he took so much of his time talking teaching with a 22 year old rookie who might not have made it through the year makes me grateful for this opportunity.
My first principal's mentorship began even before I officially started working under her. During my interview, she acknowledge that I didn't have any teaching experience so it wouldn't be fruitful to ask many of the questions she'd typically ask. Instead, so she drew on something I had a lot of experience in--working in restaurants. She used scenarios of how I handled irate customers, when to ask for a manager's help, how I approached working with other servers, and more. Rather than emphasizing my obvious deficiencies, she gave me an opportunity to speak knowledgeably about what I did know. This was the only interview I exited feeling like maybe I actually could do this work. With some perspective, I can see that what she did for me in that interview is exactly what we want to do as teachers with our students; meet students where they are and build on the extensive real world knowledge they bring to the classroom.
Once I began working for her, my principal's mentorship continued. She freed me from duties so that I could observe other ELA teachers who served as models for classroom management and strong instruction. Our staff meetings often had professional readings about instruction, included text-based discussion protocols, and tangible techniques to implement in our classrooms before the next staff meeting. At times we examined student work, shared lessons and best practices. Professional Learning Groups didn't appear in our district officially until almost ten years later, but she certainly ensured we were a group of professionals learning together. Like all my best teachers from my K-12 education, I still have and reference some of the readings and materials she provided us. On a more individual basis, I greatly appreciated the conversations I had with her after she had been in my classroom. She seemed genuinely curious when she asked questions about the lessons she had observed and also named very specific actions during the lesson that were positive. For example, rephrasing a question in a different way to elicit more student responses. She offered small but practical teaching advice. Specially, I remember she commented on increasing my wait time after posing a question. This was something, she said, that she always struggled with as well so she got into the habit of slowly tapping each finger on her leg or arm one at a time to remind herself of that time. Even when I'm facilitating a PLG for adults, I still use this strategy to remind myself to slow down and allow people time to process and speak.
A
A little later into my career I had an assistant principal who served as an incredibly effective instructional leader mentor. He visited my classroom often and stopped by my room to informally talk to me about instructional decisions I had made. Eventually he introduced me to the Universal Design for Learning framework by connecting specific elements he saw in my classroom to the guidelines of UDL. Our conversations were fueled by curiosity, respect, and reciprocal learning. Aside from having a profound effect on my classroom, his mentorship as an instructional leader also solidified for me that teacher professional development must be a priority in a school and that it works best when classroom teachers and administrators collaborate to actualize a plan.
I feel fortunate to have had mentors who exhibited both high expectations and patience with me as a teacher. They weren't simply telling me I needed to build relationships with or engage my students. They were doing those things with and for me. It is this human element of teaching and the network of mentorship that feels like it is missing for teachers right now. Being present in my classroom was an essential element of the mentor relationships I experienced and for some (likely many) reasons, this seems as if that's not as common right now. It has begun to feel as if it's not even possible right now, as if there are so many other burdens placed on administrators that being in classrooms feels like a luxury more than a priority.
Recently, I've been wondering whether the coach roles are intended predominately to provide the type of mentorship I received early on in my career. It has certainly never been explicitly communicated that way, but as we increase the number of coaching positions it seems that coaches are more likely to be in classrooms frequently. It follows, then, that coaches would be more likely to have conversations about instructional moves and decisions with teachers. I'm unsure, though, if this relationship has the same school-wide impact as strong relationships teachers/admin formed on discussions about the complexities of day-to-day teaching.
No comments:
Post a Comment